Description: {"definition": "9-level classification of counties by metro-nonmetro status, location, and urban size", "availableYears": "2010 (Released May 2013)", "name": "Rural-urban continuum code, 2013", "units": "Classification", "shortName": "RuralUrbanContinuumCode2013", "geographicLevel": "County", "dataSources": "U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau"}
Description: {"definition": "12-level classification of counties by metro-micro-nonmetro status, location, and size of largest place", "availableYears": "2010 (Released May 2013)", "name": "Urban influence code, 2013", "units": "Classification", "shortName": "UrbanInfluenceCode2013", "geographicLevel": "County", "dataSources": "U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau"}
Description: {"definition": "Classification of counties by metro or nonmetro definition, where 1=metro county; 0=nonmetro county; metro areas include all counties containing one or more urbanized areas: high-density urban areas containing 50,000 people or more; metro areas also include outlying counties that are economically tied to the central counties, as measured by the share of workers commuting on a daily basis to the central counties. Nonmetro counties are outside the boundaries of metro areas and have no cities with 50,000 residents or more", "availableYears": "2010 (Released February 2013)", "name": "Metro, 2013", "units": "Classification", "shortName": "Metro2013", "geographicLevel": "County", "dataSources": "Office of Management and Budget, Statistical Programs and Standards"}
Description: {"definition": "Classification of counties by metro or nonmetro definition, where 1=nonmetro county; 0=metro county; nonmetro counties are outside the boundaries of metro areas and have no urban areas with 50,000 residents or more", "availableYears": "2010 (Released February 2013)", "name": "Nonmetro, 2013", "units": "Classification", "shortName": "Nonmetro2013", "geographicLevel": "County", "dataSources": "Office of Management and Budget, Statistical Programs and Standards"}
Description: {"definition": "Classification of counties by micropolitan (micro) definition, where 1=micro county; 0=outside micro areas; micro areas include all counties containing one or more urban areas containing 10,000-49,999 people; micropolitan areas also include outlying counties that are economically tied to the central counties, as measured by the share of workers commuting on a daily basis to the central counties", "availableYears": "2010 (Released February 2013)", "name": "Micropolitan, 2013", "units": "Classification", "shortName": "Micropolitan2013", "geographicLevel": "County", "dataSources": "Office of Management and Budget, Statistical Programs and Standards"}
Name: County typology economic types, 2015 edition
Display Field: FIPSTXT
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: {"definition": "Non-overlapping classification of counties by measures of earnings and employment, where 1=farm-dependent; 2=Mining-dependent ;3=Manufacturing-dependent 4=Federal/State Government-dependent; 5=Services-dependent; 6=Nonspecialized", "availableYears": "2010-2012", "name": "County typology economic types, 2015 edition", "units": "Number", "shortName": "Type_2015_Update", "geographicLevel": "County", "dataSources": "U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, County Typology Codes, using data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis"}
Description: {"definition": "Farm-dependent county indicator. 0=no 1=yes. Faming accounted for at 25% or more of the county earnings or 16% or more of the employment averaged over 2010-2012", "availableYears": "2010-2012", "name": "Farming-dependent counties, 2015 edition", "units": "Number", "shortName": "Type_2015_Farming_NO", "geographicLevel": "County", "dataSources": "U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, County Typology Codes, using data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis"}
Description: {"definition": "Manufacturing-dependent county indicator. 0=no 1=yes. Manufacturing accounted for 23% or more of the county earnings or 16% of the employment averaged over 2010-12", "availableYears": "2010-2012", "name": "Manufacturing-dependent counties, 2015 edition", "units": "Number", "shortName": "Type_2015_Manufacturing_NO", "geographicLevel": "County", "dataSources": "U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, County Typology Codes, using data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis"}
Description: {"definition": "Mining-dependent county indicator. 0=no 1=yes. Mining accounted for 13% or more of the county earnings or 8% of the employment averaged over 2010-12", "availableYears": "2010-2012", "name": "Mining-dependent counties, 2015 edition", "units": "Number", "shortName": "Type_2015_Mining_NO", "geographicLevel": "County", "dataSources": "U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, County Typology Codes, using data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis"}
Description: {"definition": "Federal/State government-dependent county indicator. 0=no 1=yes. Civilian Federal and State government accounted for 14% or more of the county earnings or 9% or more of the employment averaged over 2010-2012", "availableYears": "2010-2012", "name": "Federal/State government-dependent counties, 2015 edition", "units": "Number", "shortName": "Type_2015_Government_NO", "geographicLevel": "County", "dataSources": "U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, County Typology Codes, using data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis"}
Description: {"definition": "Wage and salary employment and income in entertainment and recreation, accommodations, eating and drinking places, and real estate as a percentage of all employment reported by BEA, and vacant housing intended for seasonal use in 2010", "availableYears": "2010-2012", "name": "Recreation counties, 2015 edition", "units": "Number", "shortName": "Type_2015_Recreation_NO", "geographicLevel": "County", "dataSources": "U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, County Typology Codes, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau and the Bureau of Economic Analysis"}
Description: {"definition": "Low education county indicator. 0=no 1=yes. At least 20% or more of the residents age 25 to 64 did not have a high school diploma or equivalent between 2008-12", "availableYears": "2008-2012", "name": "Low education counties, 2015 edition", "units": "Number", "shortName": "Low_Education_2015_update", "geographicLevel": "County", "dataSources": "U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, using American Community Survey data from the U.S. Census Bureau"}
Description: {"definition": "Classification of counties by level of employment, where Low-employment county indicator. 0=no 1=yes. Less than 65% of residents age 25-64 were employed in 2008-12", "availableYears": "2008-2012", "name": "Low employment counties, 2015 edition", "units": "Number", "shortName": "Low_Employment_2015_update", "geographicLevel": "County", "dataSources": "U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, using American Community Survey data from the U.S. Census Bureau"}
Description: {"definition": "Population loss county indicator. 0=no 1=yes. Number of resident declined between the 1990 and 2000 censuses and also between the 2000 and 2010 censuses", "availableYears": "1990-2010", "name": "Population loss counties, 2015 edition", "units": "Number", "shortName": "Population_loss_2015_update", "geographicLevel": "County", "dataSources": "U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, using Decennial Census data from the U.S. Census Bureau"}
Description: {"definition": "Retirement destination county indicator. 0=no 1=yes. Number of resident 60 and older grew by 15 percent or more due to net migration between 2000 and 2010 ", "availableYears": "2000-2010", "name": "Retirement destination counties, 2015 edition", "units": "Number", "shortName": "Retirement_Destination_2015_Update", "geographicLevel": "County", "dataSources": "Applied Population Laboratory, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Net Migration Patterns for US Counties"}
Description: {"definition": "Classification of counties by physical attributes, where 1=high natural amenities county; 0=all other counties; a high natural amenities county falls in the top quartile of counties ranked by the ERS natural amenities scale; the scale combines six measures of climate, topography, and water area that reflect environmental qualities most people prefer", "availableYears": "Not Applicable", "name": "High natural amenities", "units": "Classification", "shortName": "HiAmenity", "geographicLevel": "County", "dataSources": "U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Natural Amenity Scale"}
Description: {"definition": "Classification of counties by number of people in creative occupations, where 1=creative class county; 0=all other counties; a creative class county falls in the top quartile of counties ranked by percent of employed persons 16 years old or older in occupations that involve thinking creatively. This skill element is defined as developing, designing, or creating new applications, ideas, relationships, systems, or products, including artistic contributions", "availableYears": "2000", "name": "Creative class, 2000", "units": "Classification", "shortName": "HiCreativeClass2000", "geographicLevel": "County", "dataSources": "U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Creative Class Codes, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau and the Bureau of Labor Statistics"}